Alexander v. Wexford Institutional, 3:16-cv-949-JPG-RJD. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20190516a40
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 15, 2019
Latest Update: May 15, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly has issued a Report and Recommendations ("Report") on the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 123, 128.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in her Report. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial ob
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly has issued a Report and Recommendations ("Report") on the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 123, 128.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in her Report. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial obj..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly has issued a Report and Recommendations ("Report") on the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 123, 128.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in her Report. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
No party here has filed an objection. The Court has accordingly reviewed the entire file for clear error, yet finds none. For that reason, the Court:
• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 128);
• GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 123); and
• DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the claims against defendants Trost, Fuentes, Prosise, and Cady.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
