Smith v. Stanish, 1:18-CV-1554. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190801d74
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2019, upon consideration of defendants' motions (Docs. 25, 26), and in accordance with the memorandum issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motions (Docs. 25, 26) are GRANTED on the ground that plaintiff did not properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. 3. The Clerk
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2019, upon consideration of defendants' motions (Docs. 25, 26), and in accordance with the memorandum issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motions (Docs. 25, 26) are GRANTED on the ground that plaintiff did not properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. 3. The Clerk o..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2019, upon consideration of defendants' motions (Docs. 25, 26), and in accordance with the memorandum issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motions (Docs. 25, 26) are GRANTED on the ground that plaintiff did not properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff.
3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.
4. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Source: Leagle
