U.S. v. AHMED, 09-20239-3. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130603936
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE (Dkt. No. 46), and 3) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE (Dkt. No. 52) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation to dismiss with prejudice Petitioner's Motion to Vacate and denying Petitioner's Motion to Expedite. (Dkt. No. 54.) Having reviewed that Report and Recommend
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE (Dkt. No. 46), and 3) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE (Dkt. No. 52) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation to dismiss with prejudice Petitioner's Motion to Vacate and denying Petitioner's Motion to Expedite. (Dkt. No. 54.) Having reviewed that Report and Recommenda..
More
OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE (Dkt. No. 46), and 3) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE (Dkt. No. 52)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation to dismiss with prejudice Petitioner's Motion to Vacate and denying Petitioner's Motion to Expedite. (Dkt. No. 54.)
Having reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Sentence, and DENIES Petitioner's Motion to Expedite.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
