U.S. v. FLEMINO, 15-170 (1) (MJD/SER). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20151105d17
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated September 16, 2015 [Docket No. 29]. Defendant objects to the Report and Recommendation to deny his motion to suppress on the grounds that such recommendation lacks factual and legal support. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b).
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated September 16, 2015 [Docket No. 29]. Defendant objects to the Report and Recommendation to deny his motion to suppress on the grounds that such recommendation lacks factual and legal support. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). B..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated September 16, 2015 [Docket No. 29]. Defendant objects to the Report and Recommendation to deny his motion to suppress on the grounds that such recommendation lacks factual and legal support.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rau dated September 16, 2015.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Enrico A. Flemino's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Through Search and Seizure [Doc. No. 21] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
