Ezell v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:18CV00161-JMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20190820e20
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c), with any appeal to
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c), with any appeal to ..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Court, having reviewed the record, the administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law and having heard oral argument, finds as follows, to-wit:
For the reasons announced by the Court on the record at the conclusion of oral argument during a hearing held in this matter today, the Court finds there is no reversible error, and the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
Source: Leagle
