CHAMBLISS v. LINCOLN MOTOR COMPANY, 5:16-CV-00125-DCB-MTP. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20170203g46
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2017
Summary: AGREED ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the unopposed ore tenus motion of Defendant Ford Motor Company to extend its deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. The Court, having considered the motion and being advised that Plaintiffs agree to the requested extension, finds that the motion is well-taken and due to be granted. It is therefore, ordered, that Ford's response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand shall be due no later than Febru
Summary: AGREED ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the unopposed ore tenus motion of Defendant Ford Motor Company to extend its deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. The Court, having considered the motion and being advised that Plaintiffs agree to the requested extension, finds that the motion is well-taken and due to be granted. It is therefore, ordered, that Ford's response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand shall be due no later than Februa..
More
AGREED ORDER
DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the unopposed ore tenus motion of Defendant Ford Motor Company to extend its deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. The Court, having considered the motion and being advised that Plaintiffs agree to the requested extension, finds that the motion is well-taken and due to be granted.
It is therefore, ordered, that Ford's response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand shall be due no later than February 3, 2017.
Source: Leagle
