Eyetalk365, LLC v. LIVE WATCH SECURITY, LLC, 3:14-CV-527-FDW-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150624c74
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Case Deadlines" (Document No. 46) filed June 22, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and following consultation with Judge Whitney's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion. By the instant motion, the parties seek to "
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Case Deadlines" (Document No. 46) filed June 22, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and following consultation with Judge Whitney's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion. By the instant motion, the parties seek to "s..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Case Deadlines" (Document No. 46) filed June 22, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and following consultation with Judge Whitney's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion.
By the instant motion, the parties seek to "stay the deadlines in this matter until July 7, 2015, so that the parties can finalize the settlement agreement." (Document No. 46, p.1). The undersigned commends the parties' efforts to resolve this matter; however, it does not appear there are any pending deadlines between now and July 7, 2015. See (Document No. 27). As such, it appears the requested relief is unnecessary.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Joint Motion To Stay Case Deadlines" (Document No. 46) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
