Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roeslein & Associates, Inc. v. Elgin, 4:17 CV 1351 JMB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20190124c00 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN M. BODENHAUSEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendants Elgin Meyer-Bioenergy Co., J.S. Meyer Engineering, P.C., and M & K Engineering Consultants, Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") Suggestion of Bankruptcy (ECF No. 134), which the Court construes as a motion to stay these proceedings as to Defendant Thomas Elgin ("Elgin"). In the Suggestion of Bankruptcy, Defendants indicate that Elgin filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United State
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Elgin Meyer-Bioenergy Co., J.S. Meyer Engineering, P.C., and M & K Engineering Consultants, Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") Suggestion of Bankruptcy (ECF No. 134), which the Court construes as a motion to stay these proceedings as to Defendant Thomas Elgin ("Elgin").

In the Suggestion of Bankruptcy, Defendants indicate that Elgin filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, Bankruptcy Division, Case No. 18-46227 on September 28, 2018.1

The Eighth Circuit follows the rule that an automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) "is not available to nonbankrupt codefendants, `even if they are in similar or factual nexus with the debtor[,]'" unless a case involves unusual circumstances. Croyden Assocs. v. Alleco, Inc., 969 F.2d 675, 677 (8th Cir. 1992); see e.g., Sav-A-Trip, Inc. v. Belfort, 164 F.3d 1137, 1139 (8th Cir. 1999) (holding that an automatic stay applicable to a defendant firm and one of its employees did not extend to nonbankrupt codefendants). An automatic bankruptcy stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) applies to actions initiated against a debtor. Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1009-10 (8th Cir. 1991). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant proceedings are stayed as to Defendant Thomas Elgin pending resolution of Defendant Thomas Elgin's bankruptcy until such time as the bankruptcy proceedings have been concluded or Court action is otherwise required.

FootNotes


1. The Court takes judicial notice of the records in Elgin's bankruptcy case. Federal courts "may take judicial notice of proceedings in other courts that relate directly to matters at issue." Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 492 F.3d 986, 996 (8th Cir. 2007).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer