U.S. v. CHAUDHARI, 8:17CR86. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170712e02
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendants' unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [46] and [49]. Counsel are seeking additional time to negotiate a pleas with the government. Defendants have complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [46] and [49] are granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for June 18, 2017 is continued to November 7, 20
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendants' unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [46] and [49]. Counsel are seeking additional time to negotiate a pleas with the government. Defendants have complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [46] and [49] are granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for June 18, 2017 is continued to November 7, 201..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendants' unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [46] and [49]. Counsel are seeking additional time to negotiate a pleas with the government. Defendants have complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [46] and [49] are granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for June 18, 2017 is continued to November 7, 2017.
2. The defendants have filed affidavits required by paragraph 9 of the progression order and NE.CrimR 12.1(a) forthwith.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and November 7, 2017, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
