ISHIYAMA v. GLINES, 2:16-cv-00222-APG-PAL. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160229a65
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Plaintiff and Defendant Glines' failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) February 4, 2016. Defendant Samuel M. Glines filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) February 11, 2016. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shal
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Plaintiff and Defendant Glines' failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) February 4, 2016. Defendant Samuel M. Glines filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) February 11, 2016. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall..
More
ORDER
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Plaintiff and Defendant Glines' failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) February 4, 2016. Defendant Samuel M. Glines filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) February 11, 2016. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff and Defendant Glines have failed to comply. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendant Glines shall file their certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 10, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
Source: Leagle
