Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS v. ROUSH, 406 S.W.3d 87 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri Number: inadvmoco140114009374 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2013
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Robert Roush appeals the trial court's judgment convicting him of domestic assault in violation of the City of Richmond Heights' ordinance. The trial court did not err in denying Roush's motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all evidence. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Roush appeals the trial court's judgment convicting him of domestic assault in violation of the City of Richmond Heights' ordinance. The trial court did not err in denying Roush's motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all evidence. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer