Eyetalk365, LLC v. SKYBELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:16-CV-702-FDW-DCK. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20170918a38
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Skybell Technologies, Inc.'s Motion For Issuance Of Court Order To Direct Production Of Documents In Response To Subpoena" (Document No. 37) filed September 14, 2017. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of Plaintiff's counsel, as well as
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Skybell Technologies, Inc.'s Motion For Issuance Of Court Order To Direct Production Of Documents In Response To Subpoena" (Document No. 37) filed September 14, 2017. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of Plaintiff's counsel, as well as P..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Skybell Technologies, Inc.'s Motion For Issuance Of Court Order To Direct Production Of Documents In Response To Subpoena" (Document No. 37) filed September 14, 2017. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C §636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of Plaintiff's counsel, as well as Poyner Spruill LLP, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendant Skybell Technologies, Inc.'s Motion For Issuance Of Court Order To Direct Production Of Documents In Response To Subpoena" (Document No. 37) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall produce the deposition transcripts requested in the subpoena. To the extent any portions of the deposition transcripts were marked or treated as confidential in the previous cases, the transcripts shall be produced and treated as "Confidential" pursuant to Judge Whitney's Standing Protective Order for Civil cases.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
