Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING MOTION TO FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the [62] Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on June 5, 2019. Judge Walker recommends that the [59] Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants should be granted and that the 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights complaint filed by Carlos Dawayne Foxx should be dismissed with prejudice for failure t
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING MOTION TO FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the [62] Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on June 5, 2019. Judge Walker recommends that the [59] Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants should be granted and that the 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights complaint filed by Carlos Dawayne Foxx should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING MOTION TO FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the [62] Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on June 5, 2019. Judge Walker recommends that the [59] Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants should be granted and that the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint filed by Carlos Dawayne Foxx should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 298 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Judge Walker also recommends that Foxx be assessed a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The record reflects that the Court mailed a copy of the Report and Recommendation to Foxx, but Foxx has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Foxx also did not respond to the [59] Motion for Summary Judgment.
Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made.") In such cases, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having conducted the required review, the Court finds that Judge Walker's Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [62] Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on June 5, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [59] Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants is GRANTED. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint filed by Carlos Dawayne Foxx is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.