JACKSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:13cv127-KS-MTP. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20140627b74
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on May 28, 2014, after referral of hearing by this Court. On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff Albert L. Jackson, by and through his attorney, notified the Court [16] that he would file no objection to the Report and Recommendation, electing to file another and separate application for Title II benefits
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on May 28, 2014, after referral of hearing by this Court. On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff Albert L. Jackson, by and through his attorney, notified the Court [16] that he would file no objection to the Report and Recommendation, electing to file another and separate application for Title II benefits w..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
KEITH STARRETT, District Judge.
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on May 28, 2014, after referral of hearing by this Court. On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff Albert L. Jackson, by and through his attorney, notified the Court [16] that he would file no objection to the Report and Recommendation, electing to file another and separate application for Title II benefits with the Social Security Administration. Having reviewed fully the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this matter and being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Commissioner's decision [6] is denied. The Motion for Order Affirming the decision of the Commissioner [9] is granted and the Commissioner's decision is affirmed. The Complaint filed herein is dismissed and benefits are denied. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
