Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Frazier v. Berryhill, 2:19-cv-11097. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190513a79 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 10, 2019
Latest Update: May 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge . Plaintiff Terrance Frazier seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his application for disability benefits. On April 16, 2019, he filed an application asking this Court to grant him in forma pauperis status and thereby absolve him from prepaying any court fees. Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation on the pending application i
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Terrance Frazier seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his application for disability benefits. On April 16, 2019, he filed an application asking this Court to grant him in forma pauperis status and thereby absolve him from prepaying any court fees. Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation on the pending application issued by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4), dated April 19, 2019, recommends that Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs be denied. For the reasons described below, this Court will accept and adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and deny Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis.

DISCUSSION

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepaying court fees. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As of this date, neither party has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendations. The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of April 19, 2019 as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Magistrate Judge Morris's Report and Recommendation of April 19, 2019 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer