Obec G. v. Barr, 19-CV-2269 (NEB/HB). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20191105b99
Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY E. BRASEL , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Petitioner Obec G., a removable alien who, since filing his petition, was removed to South Sudan. In an October 16, 2019 Report and Recommendation, United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer recommended that the petition be denied as moot because Petitioner was returned to South Sudan and the Court cannot give him the relief he seeks—an order requiring imm
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY E. BRASEL , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Petitioner Obec G., a removable alien who, since filing his petition, was removed to South Sudan. In an October 16, 2019 Report and Recommendation, United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer recommended that the petition be denied as moot because Petitioner was returned to South Sudan and the Court cannot give him the relief he seeks—an order requiring imme..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
NANCY E. BRASEL, District Judge.
This is a habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by Petitioner Obec G., a removable alien who, since filing his petition, was removed to South Sudan. In an October 16, 2019 Report and Recommendation, United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer recommended that the petition be denied as moot because Petitioner was returned to South Sudan and the Court cannot give him the relief he seeks—an order requiring immediate release pending removal. [ECF No. 14.] No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED;
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and
3. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
