U.S. v. BURKE, 00-CR-106 (MJD/HB). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20150806996
Filed: Aug. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant'
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. Defendant's objection to the garnishment of her wages is OVERRULED; and
3. The attorney for the government shall prepare an Order of Garnishment, garnishing ten percent of Defendant's wages directly from her employer.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
