Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [65]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [50]; GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [52] ARTHUR J. TARNOW , Senior District Judge . On August 22, 2017, Plaintiff Bryan Cary filed this prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Defendants Corrections Officer Timothy Mox, Special Activities Coordinator David Leach, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections ("MDOC") Heidi Washington, and the Deputy Director
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [65]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [50]; GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [52] ARTHUR J. TARNOW , Senior District Judge . On August 22, 2017, Plaintiff Bryan Cary filed this prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Defendants Corrections Officer Timothy Mox, Special Activities Coordinator David Leach, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections ("MDOC") Heidi Washington, and the Deputy Director ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [65]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [50]; GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [52]
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Senior District Judge.
On August 22, 2017, Plaintiff Bryan Cary filed this prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Corrections Officer Timothy Mox, Special Activities Coordinator David Leach, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections ("MDOC") Heidi Washington, and the Deputy Director of MDOC.1
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [50] on May 25, 2018. Defendant Mox filed a Motion to Dismiss [52] on June 6, 2018.
On January 22, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [65] recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [50] and grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [52]. Neither party has filed an objection to the R&R.
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [65] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [50] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [52] is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
