Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alexander v. Calzetta, 2:16-CV-13293. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20181220c14 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROMPT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (DE166) ANTHONY P. PATTI , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's motion for prompt settlement conference, requesting that the Court schedule a settlement conference in this matter. (DE 166.) On November 30, 2018, I entered my report on the evidentiary hearing regarding exhaustion and recommendation to grant the State Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (DE
More

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROMPT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (DE166)

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's motion for prompt settlement conference, requesting that the Court schedule a settlement conference in this matter. (DE 166.)

On November 30, 2018, I entered my report on the evidentiary hearing regarding exhaustion and recommendation to grant the State Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (DE 168.) And, on December 18, 2018, I entered my report and recommendation to (1) grant State Defendants' motion to dismiss 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claims and state law claims, (2) grant Defendant Terry Meden, M.D.'s second motion for summary judgment, (3) grant Defendant Hannah Saad, M.D.'s motion to dismiss/summary judgment being filed in lieu of answering Plaintiff's complaint, and (4) sua sponte dismiss Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Derek Rosen for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (DE 170.) Acceptance of these recommendations would bring this case to a close.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for prompt settlement conference is DENIED without prejudice pending Judge Goldsmith's consideration of the pending reports and recommendations. To the extent that Plaintiff's request relates to case no. 16-12069, pending before Judges Berg and Majzoub and as referenced in the instant motion, he is free to file a motion seeking similar relief in that case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer