MINAHAN v. TOWN OF EAST LONGMEADOW, 12-cv-30203-MAP. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20140516860
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 15, 2014
Latest Update: May 15, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE (Dkt. Nos. 73 & 79) MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge. Having reviewed the substance of Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy's Report and Recommendation dated April 22, 2014 and finding it meritorious, and noting that there is no objection, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 79). Based upon this, Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 73) is h
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE (Dkt. Nos. 73 & 79) MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge. Having reviewed the substance of Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy's Report and Recommendation dated April 22, 2014 and finding it meritorious, and noting that there is no objection, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 79). Based upon this, Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 73) is he..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE
(Dkt. Nos. 73 & 79)
MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge.
Having reviewed the substance of Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy's Report and Recommendation dated April 22, 2014 and finding it meritorious, and noting that there is no objection, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 79). Based upon this, Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 73) is hereby DENIED.
It is So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
