GREATER ST. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION LABORERS WELFARE FUND v. STIKA CONCRETE CONTRACTING CO., INC., 4:14CV01406 ERW. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20150702h08
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER , Senior District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Stika Concrete Contracting Co., Inc.'s failure to show cause why Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment should not be granted. On May 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21]. No Response was filed, and on June 15, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause, "no later than June 25, 2015, why Plaintiffs' Motion should not be granted" [ECF No. 25].
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER , Senior District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Stika Concrete Contracting Co., Inc.'s failure to show cause why Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment should not be granted. On May 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21]. No Response was filed, and on June 15, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause, "no later than June 25, 2015, why Plaintiffs' Motion should not be granted" [ECF No. 25]. ..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
E. RICHARD WEBBER, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Stika Concrete Contracting Co., Inc.'s failure to show cause why Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment should not be granted. On May 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21]. No Response was filed, and on June 15, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause, "no later than June 25, 2015, why Plaintiffs' Motion should not be granted" [ECF No. 25]. Defendant has failed to file anything or otherwise make such a showing.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21] is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
