U.S. v. THOMPSON, 8:14CR291. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141009g11
Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant James E. Thompson (Thompson) (Filing No. 15). Thompson seeks an extension of thirty days in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order (Filing No. 12). Thompson's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motions will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: Thompson's motion for an extension
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant James E. Thompson (Thompson) (Filing No. 15). Thompson seeks an extension of thirty days in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order (Filing No. 12). Thompson's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motions will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: Thompson's motion for an extension o..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant James E. Thompson (Thompson) (Filing No. 15). Thompson seeks an extension of thirty days in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order (Filing No. 12). Thompson's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motions will be granted.
IT IS ORDERED:
Thompson's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 15) is granted. Thompson is given until on or before November 7, 2014, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between October 8, 2014, and November 7, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
