Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Lockwood, 16-20466. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180501d61 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 01, 2018
Latest Update: May 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER (1) DENYING REQUESTS FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (ECF ## 26, 28) AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (ECF #30) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On June 23, 2016, Defendant Jared Lockwood ("Lockwood") was charged in an indictment with (1) manufacture of an unregistered destructive device, (2) possession of an unregistered destructive device, (3) a false statement or representation made to a department or agency of the Uni
More

ORDER (1) DENYING REQUESTS FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (ECF ## 26, 28) AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (ECF #30)

On June 23, 2016, Defendant Jared Lockwood ("Lockwood") was charged in an indictment with (1) manufacture of an unregistered destructive device, (2) possession of an unregistered destructive device, (3) a false statement or representation made to a department or agency of the United States, and (4) a false declaration before court. (See ECF #1.) On August 23, 2016, pursuant to a Rule 11 plea agreement, Lockwood pleaded guilty to two counts in the indictment, Count One: Manufacture of Unregistered Destructive Devices and Count Four: False Declaration Before the Court. (See Rule 11 Plea Agreement, ECF #12.) The Court imposed a sentence of imprisonment of 120 months on Count One and 60 months on Count Four. (See ECF #16 at Pg. ID 193.) On January 18, 2018, Lockwood filed a motion to vacate or set aside the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (See ECF #21.)

On January 25, 2018, the Court entered an Order in which it, among other things, denied Lockwood's motion to vacate or set aside his sentence and denied a certificate of appealability. (See ECF #24.) Lockwood has now filed two requests for a certificate of appealability on the issues presented in his motion to vacate or set aside his sentence. (See ECF ## 26, 28.) The Court already denied a certificate of appealability on these issues and explained the basis for its denial in its Order dated January 25, 2018. The Court therefore denies Lockwood's requests for a certificate of appealability for the same reasons it denied a certificate of appealability in its January 25, 2018, Order.

Lockwood has also filed a notice of appeal of the January 25, 2018, Order (see ECF #27) and an application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs on appeal. (See ECF #30.) The Court has reviewed the application and concludes that Lockwood is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees or costs on appeal.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Lockwood's requests for a certificate of appealability (ECF ## 26, 28.) are DENIED; and 2. Lockwood's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs on appeal (ECF #30) is GRANTED.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer