FITZGERALD v. TRANS UNION, LLC, 17-3842. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180110d55
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG , District Judge . AND NOW , this 8 th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Penn Liberty Bank and WSFS Bank (Doc. No. 11) and the Response of Plaintiff Peter R. Fitzgerald (Doc. No. 15), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint is DENIED ; and 2. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint is
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG , District Judge . AND NOW , this 8 th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Penn Liberty Bank and WSFS Bank (Doc. No. 11) and the Response of Plaintiff Peter R. Fitzgerald (Doc. No. 15), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint is DENIED ; and 2. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint is ..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Penn Liberty Bank and WSFS Bank (Doc. No. 11) and the Response of Plaintiff Peter R. Fitzgerald (Doc. No. 15), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint is DENIED; and
2. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint is GRANTED and Count II is DISMISSED as alleged against Defendants Penn Liberty Bank and WSFS Bank.
Source: Leagle
