U.S. v. RAY, 8:13CR135. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20130809a78
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Thalken's findings and recommendation. (Filing 33 .) The magistrate recommends that Defendant Daniel T. Ray's motion to suppress (filing 21 ) be denied. (Filing 33 at CM/ECF p. 10.) Defendant has not objected to this recommendation. ( See Docket Sheet.) I have conducted a de novo review of the record. I find that inasmuch as the magistrate judge has fully, carefully, and corre
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Thalken's findings and recommendation. (Filing 33 .) The magistrate recommends that Defendant Daniel T. Ray's motion to suppress (filing 21 ) be denied. (Filing 33 at CM/ECF p. 10.) Defendant has not objected to this recommendation. ( See Docket Sheet.) I have conducted a de novo review of the record. I find that inasmuch as the magistrate judge has fully, carefully, and correc..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Thalken's findings and recommendation. (Filing 33.) The magistrate recommends that Defendant Daniel T. Ray's motion to suppress (filing 21) be denied. (Filing 33 at CM/ECF p. 10.) Defendant has not objected to this recommendation. (See Docket Sheet.)
I have conducted a de novo review of the record. I find that inasmuch as the magistrate judge has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and applied the law, the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation should be adopted and the defendant's motion to suppress should be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge's findings and recommendation (filing 33) is adopted.
2. Defendant Daniel T. Ray's motion to suppress (filing 21) is denied in all respects.
Source: Leagle
