United States v. Sharron, 8:19CR110. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190708901
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [23]. Counsel needs additional time to discuss resolution of the matter and/or prepare for trial. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [23] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for July 15, 2019 is continued to August 26, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of j
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [23]. Counsel needs additional time to discuss resolution of the matter and/or prepare for trial. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [23] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for July 15, 2019 is continued to August 26, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of ju..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [23]. Counsel needs additional time to discuss resolution of the matter and/or prepare for trial. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [23] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for July 15, 2019 is continued to August 26, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and August 26, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
