Filed: Jan. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30, this Court's order and judgment, Filing Nos. 28 and 29. Plaintiff also files a motion to clarify, Filing No. 32, a motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33, and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35. The Court has reviewed each of these motions and finds they are frivolous and with
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30, this Court's order and judgment, Filing Nos. 28 and 29. Plaintiff also files a motion to clarify, Filing No. 32, a motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33, and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35. The Court has reviewed each of these motions and finds they are frivolous and witho..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30, this Court's order and judgment, Filing Nos. 28 and 29. Plaintiff also files a motion to clarify, Filing No. 32, a motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33, and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35. The Court has reviewed each of these motions and finds they are frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, the Court will deny the same.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30, motion to clarify, Filing No. 32, motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33, and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35, are all denied.
