DORANTI v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 13-1667 (DWF/LIB). (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20130731d02
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 10, 2013. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Re
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 10, 2013. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Rec..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 10, 2013. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois's July 10, 2013 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [3]) is ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. [1]) is DENIED.
3. Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED.
4. This action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.
5. Petitioner is not granted a Certificate of Appealability.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
