United States v. Greene, 1:18 CR 88. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190809d14
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER W. CARLETON METCALF , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. 62), which requests that the Court seal Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. 64). The Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that sealing is necessary in this
Summary: ORDER W. CARLETON METCALF , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. 62), which requests that the Court seal Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. 64). The Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that sealing is necessary in this ..
More
ORDER
W. CARLETON METCALF, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. 62), which requests that the Court seal Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. 64).
The Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that sealing is necessary in this case, and that less restrictive means of handling the information are not sufficient. The sealing ordered herein shall be permanent, subject to further Order of the Court.
Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. 62) is GRANTED, and Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. 64) shall be SEALED and remain sealed until further Order of the Court.1
FootNotes
1. The Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Continue Sentencing itself has been denied by the presiding District Judge. This Order pertains only to the accessibility of that document on the docket.
Source: Leagle
