Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Murillo, 8:18CR113. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180525c13 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 24, 2018
Latest Update: May 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE [28]. The Court notes that a jury trial as to this defendant is set for June 11, 2018, before District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., and that the pretrial motions deadline expired on May 16, 2018. However, for good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Leave is given to file pretrial motions on or before, July 16, 2018. Accordingly, IT I
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE [28]. The Court notes that a jury trial as to this defendant is set for June 11, 2018, before District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., and that the pretrial motions deadline expired on May 16, 2018. However, for good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Leave is given to file pretrial motions on or before, July 16, 2018. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE [28] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before July 16, 2018.

2. Defendant's jury trial scheduled for June 11, 2018, is cancelled, and shall be rescheduled upon the expiration of the July 16, 2018, pretrial motion filing deadline.

3. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 16, 2018, and July 16, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer