U.S. v. Henry, 8:17CR146. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180531c54
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the government's unopposed Motion to Continue [77]. The parties anticipate a plea in this matter, but seek additional time to negotiate the terms of the plea agreement. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the government's unopposed Motion to Continue [77] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 5, 2018, is continued to July 10 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the government's unopposed Motion to Continue [77]. The parties anticipate a plea in this matter, but seek additional time to negotiate the terms of the plea agreement. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the government's unopposed Motion to Continue [77] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 5, 2018, is continued to July 10 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the c..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the government's unopposed Motion to Continue [77]. The parties anticipate a plea in this matter, but seek additional time to negotiate the terms of the plea agreement. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the government's unopposed Motion to Continue [77] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for June 5, 2018, is continued to July 10 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 10, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle