Filed: Feb. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [105] filed by defendant Reynaldo Urbina-Sotres and Motion to Continue Trial [106] filed by defendant Sylvia Garcia. Counsel needs additional time to explore plea negotiations. The defendants shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [105] filed by defendant Reynaldo Urbina-Sotres and Motion to Continue T
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [105] filed by defendant Reynaldo Urbina-Sotres and Motion to Continue Trial [106] filed by defendant Sylvia Garcia. Counsel needs additional time to explore plea negotiations. The defendants shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [105] filed by defendant Reynaldo Urbina-Sotres and Motion to Continue Tr..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [105] filed by defendant Reynaldo Urbina-Sotres and Motion to Continue Trial [106] filed by defendant Sylvia Garcia. Counsel needs additional time to explore plea negotiations. The defendants shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [105] filed by defendant Reynaldo Urbina-Sotres and Motion to Continue Trial [106] filed by defendant Sylvia Garcia are granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for March 3, 2015 is continued to April 7, 2015.
2. Defendants shall file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practical.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and April 7, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
