U.S. v. Folly, 8:17CR14. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190510b81
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 09, 2019
Latest Update: May 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [145]. Counsel needs additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. Good cause being shown, the motion shall be granted and the trial shall be continued. IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, previously scheduled set for June 3, 2019, is continued to July 15, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [145]. Counsel needs additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. Good cause being shown, the motion shall be granted and the trial shall be continued. IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, previously scheduled set for June 3, 2019, is continued to July 15, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [145]. Counsel needs additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. Good cause being shown, the motion shall be granted and the trial shall be continued.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, previously scheduled set for June 3, 2019, is continued to July 15, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 15, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
