Radford v. U.S., 4:15 CV 1720 RWS. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20160212a01
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL , District Judge . Plaintiffs' "motion to postpone defendant's psychology discovery request" will be denied for the same reason their "motion to postpone defendant's discovery request" [34] was denied. Defendant has not served any discovery requests, including a request for an independent medical examination, on plaintiffs. As previously stated, the scheduled exams are unrelated to the instant litigation and do not constitute discovery. As such, the Co
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL , District Judge . Plaintiffs' "motion to postpone defendant's psychology discovery request" will be denied for the same reason their "motion to postpone defendant's discovery request" [34] was denied. Defendant has not served any discovery requests, including a request for an independent medical examination, on plaintiffs. As previously stated, the scheduled exams are unrelated to the instant litigation and do not constitute discovery. As such, the Cou..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs' "motion to postpone defendant's psychology discovery request" will be denied for the same reason their "motion to postpone defendant's discovery request" [34] was denied. Defendant has not served any discovery requests, including a request for an independent medical examination, on plaintiffs. As previously stated, the scheduled exams are unrelated to the instant litigation and do not constitute discovery. As such, the Court cannot order a stay of these exams.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' "motion to postpone defendant's psychology discovery request" [36] is denied.
Source: Leagle
