U.S. v. RIGLER, 8:13CR434. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141014b09
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by the government (Filing No. 25). The court held a telephone conference with counsel on October 1, 2014. Counsel for the defendant had no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted but only for a period of thirty days. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion to continue trial (Filing No. 25) is granted for a period of thirty days. 2. Trial of this
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by the government (Filing No. 25). The court held a telephone conference with counsel on October 1, 2014. Counsel for the defendant had no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted but only for a period of thirty days. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion to continue trial (Filing No. 25) is granted for a period of thirty days. 2. Trial of this ..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by the government (Filing No. 25). The court held a telephone conference with counsel on October 1, 2014. Counsel for the defendant had no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted but only for a period of thirty days.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The motion to continue trial (Filing No. 25) is granted for a period of thirty days.
2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for November 10, 2014, before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between October 1, 2014, and November 10, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
