United States v. Massey, 3:17-cr-320-MOC-DSC-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190904891
Visitors: 32
Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Letter Requesting Return of Property, which the Court will construe as a pro se motion. (#28). The court notes that defendant is still represented by court-appointed counsel in this matter. Under L.Cr.R. 41.7(h), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already ably represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing any
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Letter Requesting Return of Property, which the Court will construe as a pro se motion. (#28). The court notes that defendant is still represented by court-appointed counsel in this matter. Under L.Cr.R. 41.7(h), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already ably represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing any ..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Letter Requesting Return of Property, which the Court will construe as a pro se motion. (#28). The court notes that defendant is still represented by court-appointed counsel in this matter. Under L.Cr.R. 41.7(h), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already ably represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing any appropriate motions on his behalf, and the Court will gladly hear any motion defendant's counsel makes on his behalf. Having thus considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, to the extent it is treated as a motion, defendant's pro se Letter Requesting Return of Property (#28) is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
