United States v. Blackhawk, 6:09-CV-03033-MDH. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20200310c66
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2020
Summary: ORDER DOUGLAS HARPOOL , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 104). Defendant has not filed exceptions, and the matter is ripe for review. Defendant filed a pro se Motion to Enforce Agreement to Conditionally Release Him to a Residential House (Doc. 102) wherein he requested the Court immediately release him to the Shiloh Assisted Living Facility in accordance with the Order of Conditional Release issued by this Court on October
Summary: ORDER DOUGLAS HARPOOL , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 104). Defendant has not filed exceptions, and the matter is ripe for review. Defendant filed a pro se Motion to Enforce Agreement to Conditionally Release Him to a Residential House (Doc. 102) wherein he requested the Court immediately release him to the Shiloh Assisted Living Facility in accordance with the Order of Conditional Release issued by this Court on October ..
More
ORDER
DOUGLAS HARPOOL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 104). Defendant has not filed exceptions, and the matter is ripe for review. Defendant filed a pro se Motion to Enforce Agreement to Conditionally Release Him to a Residential House (Doc. 102) wherein he requested the Court immediately release him to the Shiloh Assisted Living Facility in accordance with the Order of Conditional Release issued by this Court on October 18, 2019. (Doc. 100). Defendant is currently detained at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota.
The Magistrate Judge recommends this motion be denied for two reasons. First, the Court is not required to entertain pro se filings by defendants represented by counsel. United States v. Tollefson, 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2017) (internal citations omitted). Second, the Order of Conditional Release conditions the release of Defendant on the availability of a bed at the assisted living facility, which Defendant has not shown.
After careful review, the Court concurs with the analysis of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendant's pro se motion is hereby DENIED. The government is reminded that under the Court's prior order, it is obligated to conditionally release Defendant to the Shiloh Assisted Living Facility as soon as a bed is available. (Doc. 100 at 2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
