Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WEBSTER, 8:14CR307. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20140924g90 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the oral motion of the parties for an extension of the discovery and pretrial motion deadline. The motion was made during the arraignment on the defendant Daniel Webster, III (Webster), on Indictment on September 23, 2014. Webster acknowledged the additional time needed for his motion would be excluded under the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act. The oral motion was granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion for
More

ORDER

THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the oral motion of the parties for an extension of the discovery and pretrial motion deadline. The motion was made during the arraignment on the defendant Daniel Webster, III (Webster), on Indictment on September 23, 2014. Webster acknowledged the additional time needed for his motion would be excluded under the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act. The oral motion was granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion for an extension of time for discovery and to file pretrial motions is granted. The parties shall have to on or before October 20, 2014, in which to complete discovery. The parties shall have to on or before December 19, 2014, in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., from September 23, 2014, to December 19, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer