Rustad v. Bank of America Corporation, CV 16-72-M-DLC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20181004840
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay. (Doc. 34.) The Parties represent that a stay is appropriate because there is a parallel action with an additional party in the Montana Third Judicial District Court, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, Cause No. DV-17-56, which for the reasons of judicial efficiency and minimizing the expense to the parties, needs to be resolved first. IT IS ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay (Doc.
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay. (Doc. 34.) The Parties represent that a stay is appropriate because there is a parallel action with an additional party in the Montana Third Judicial District Court, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, Cause No. DV-17-56, which for the reasons of judicial efficiency and minimizing the expense to the parties, needs to be resolved first. IT IS ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay (Doc. ..
More
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay. (Doc. 34.) The Parties represent that a stay is appropriate because there is a parallel action with an additional party in the Montana Third Judicial District Court, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, Cause No. DV-17-56, which for the reasons of judicial efficiency and minimizing the expense to the parties, needs to be resolved first.
IT IS ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay (Doc. 34) is GRANTED. This case is hereby STAYED pending resolution of the related proceeding.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all deadlines are VACATED.
Source: Leagle
