Filed: Jan. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge. AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 24, filed October 14, 2011), treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29, filed October 31, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated January 25, 2012, IT I
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge. AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 24, filed October 14, 2011), treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29, filed October 31, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated January 25, 2012, IT IS..
More
ORDER
JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 24, filed October 14, 2011), treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29, filed October 31, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated January 25, 2012, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, is DENIED.
