Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FREED v. TRUAX, 3:12-CV-177 CAN. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana Number: infdco20140813a75 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. NUECHTERLEIN, Magistrate Judge. Michael G. Freed, a pro se prisoner, filed a response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. However, in the order of June 16, 2014, the court explained why that response was insufficient to defeat the motion and afforded him until July 24, 2014, to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e)(4). He was cautioned that if he did not respond by that deadline, the summary judgment motion w
More

OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER A. NUECHTERLEIN, Magistrate Judge.

Michael G. Freed, a pro se prisoner, filed a response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. However, in the order of June 16, 2014, the court explained why that response was insufficient to defeat the motion and afforded him until July 24, 2014, to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e)(4). He was cautioned that if he did not respond by that deadline, the summary judgment motion would be granted without further delay. That deadline has now passed, but he has not responded.

For the reasons more fully explained in this court's order of June 16, 2014, (DE 43), the motion for summary judgment (DE 32) is GRANTED. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer