Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTIN v. HURLEY, 2:13CV00048 SPM. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20130710a11 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint and for an extension of time to do so [ECF No. 9]. Plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amended complaint. To obtain leave to file an amended complaint, "a party must submit the proposed amendment along with its motion." Clayton v. White Hall School Dist. , 778 F.2d 457 , 460 (8th Cir. 1985); see Wolgin v. Simon , 722 F.2d 389 , 395 (8th Cir.
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint and for an extension of time to do so [ECF No. 9]. Plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amended complaint.

To obtain leave to file an amended complaint, "a party must submit the proposed amendment along with its motion." Clayton v. White Hall School Dist., 778 F.2d 457, 460 (8th Cir. 1985); see Wolgin v. Simon, 722 F.2d 389, 395 (8th Cir.1983) ("Absent some indication as to what might be added to the complaint to make it viable, the [moving party] is not entitled to leave to amend."). Because plaintiff has not submitted his proposed amendment, the Court will deny the motion.

The Court denies as moot plaintiff's request for additional time to file an amended complaint. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a plaintiff to file an amendment "when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend [ECF No. 9] is DENIED without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer