Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McSwiggin v. Omni Limousine, 2:14-cv-02172-JCM-NJK (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190104b53 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONDE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTOIN TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT [FIRST REQUEST] JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of the deadline for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Settlement (ECF No. 102) from December 26, 2018 to Monday, January 7, 2019. Defense counsel is attempting to resolve the issue with Defendant but, d
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONDE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTOIN TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of the deadline for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Settlement (ECF No. 102) from December 26, 2018 to Monday, January 7, 2019. Defense counsel is attempting to resolve the issue with Defendant but, due to holiday travel, has not been able to connect with Defendant to discuss in sufficient detail prior to the deadline to respond to the Motion. This stipulation is not made for the purpose of delay but to allow counsel sufficient time to discuss a possible resolution with Defendant to make continued motion practice unnecessary.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer