Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Duey, 8:16PO2. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180308b13
Filed: Mar. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . UPON THE MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, (Filing No. 31), and no objection from the government, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Unopposed Motion to Continue Hearing [31] is granted. 2. The Change of Plea hearing is continued to May 1, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson, Courtroom No. 6, Second Floor, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 So. 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. 3. For this defendant, the time between today's date and the cha
More

ORDER

UPON THE MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, (Filing No. 31), and no objection from the government,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Unopposed Motion to Continue Hearing [31] is granted.

2. The Change of Plea hearing is continued to May 1, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson, Courtroom No. 6, Second Floor, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 So. 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska.

3. For this defendant, the time between today's date and the change of plea hearing is excluded for purposes of computing the limits under the Speedy Trial Act. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(i). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial for the reason that defendant has been approved for a diversion program and further time is required for him to complete such program.

4. No further continuances will be granted, absent unusual circumstances.

5. Since this is a criminal case, the defendant must be present, unless excused by the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer