USA v. Knutson, 0:17-cr-00157-MJD-HB. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20171221d11
Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Kate Menendez dated November 13, 2017. The Defendant objects to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that his motion to suppress evidence obtained through the search of the DVR be denied. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that rev
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Kate Menendez dated November 13, 2017. The Defendant objects to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that his motion to suppress evidence obtained through the search of the DVR be denied. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that revi..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Kate Menendez dated November 13, 2017.
The Defendant objects to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that his motion to suppress evidence obtained through the search of the DVR be denied.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court will ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to suppress (ECF No. 35) is DENIED to the extent it seeks suppression of the evidence obtained pursuant to a search of the DVR at issue.
Source: Leagle
