Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Marciniak, 2:17-cr-00014-JAD-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180502j88 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 01, 2018
Latest Update: May 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (SECOND REQUEST), JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Defendant Paul Michael Marciniak, by and through his attorney, Thomas A. Ericsson, Esq., and the United States of America, by and through Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Daniel Cowhig, Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for May 7, 2018, at the hour of 9:00 a.m., be vacated and continued until aft
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

(SECOND REQUEST),

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Defendant Paul Michael Marciniak, by and through his attorney, Thomas A. Ericsson, Esq., and the United States of America, by and through Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Daniel Cowhig, Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for May 7, 2018, at the hour of 9:00 a.m., be vacated and continued until after mid-September of 2018, to a date and time that is convenient to this Honorable Court.

The request for a continuance is based upon the following:

1. The Government's investigation into related criminal activity of other defendants is ongoing. The instant case is related to United States v. Boyar et al., 2:17-cr-21-JCM-GWF. 2. This case is not yet ripe for sentencing. 3. The parties agree to continue the sentencing hearing until after mid-September. 4. Defense counsel has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Daniel Cowhig, and the Government has no objection to the continuance. 5. Defense counsel has spoken to Mr. Marciniak, who is not in custody, and he has no objection to the continuance. 6. The additional time requested by this Stipulation to Continue Sentencing is reasonable pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 32(b)(2), which states that the "court may, for good cause, change any time limits prescribed in this rule." 7. The additional time requested herein is not sought for the purposes of undue delay. 8. Additionally, denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

1. The Government's investigation into related criminal activity of other defendants is ongoing. The instant case is related to United States v. Boyar et al., 2:17-cr-21-JCM-GWF. 2. This case is not yet ripe for sentencing. 3. The parties agree to continue the sentencing hearing until after mid-September. 4. Defense counsel has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Daniel Cowhig, and the Government has no objection to the continuance. 5. Defense counsel has spoken to Mr. Marciniak, who is not in custody, and he has no objection to the continuance. 6. The additional time requested by this Stipulation to Continue Sentencing is reasonable pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 32(b)(2), which states that the "court may, for good cause, change any time limits prescribed in this rule." 7. The additional time requested herein is not sought for the purposes of undue delay. 8. Additionally, denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interests of the public in proceeding with the sentencing hearing as scheduled, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the defendant sufficient time to obtain transportation to Las Vegas, Nevada, for the sentencing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Sentencing date in this matter scheduled for May 7, 2018, be vacated and continued to the October 1, 2018, at the hour of 10:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer