Bryant v. Warden, 3:18-CV-126-CWR-JCG. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20190614979
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES , District Judge . Before the Court is Quantrey Bryant's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. See Docket No. 16. On review, the undersigned cannot agree that the BOP Hearing Officer violated Mr. Bryant's due process rights or displayed partiality. Even if Mr. Bryant had established such a violation, moreover, he has not shown that it caused him any prejudice, as required by Boatswain v. Martinez, 519 F. App'x 253, 253 (5th Cir. 2013), s
Summary: ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES , District Judge . Before the Court is Quantrey Bryant's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. See Docket No. 16. On review, the undersigned cannot agree that the BOP Hearing Officer violated Mr. Bryant's due process rights or displayed partiality. Even if Mr. Bryant had established such a violation, moreover, he has not shown that it caused him any prejudice, as required by Boatswain v. Martinez, 519 F. App'x 253, 253 (5th Cir. 2013), si..
More
ORDER
CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge.
Before the Court is Quantrey Bryant's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. See Docket No. 16. On review, the undersigned cannot agree that the BOP Hearing Officer violated Mr. Bryant's due process rights or displayed partiality. Even if Mr. Bryant had established such a violation, moreover, he has not shown that it caused him any prejudice, as required by Boatswain v. Martinez, 519 F. App'x 253, 253 (5th Cir. 2013), since he admitted to possessing the SIM cards.
The Report and Recommendation is therefore adopted as this Court's own Order, and this case is dismissed. A separate Final Judgment shall issue this day.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
