Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Young, 4:18-CR-00175-01-W-DGK. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri Number: infdco20200207c89 Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS GREG KAYS , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Paris Young's Motion to Suppress Evidence 1 (Doc. 44), the Government's Response in Opposition (Doc. 46), and United States Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Count's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 77). The Court has also reviewed the transcript from the hearing held on January 16, 2020 (Doc. 72). After carefully reviewing Judge Count's report
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Before the Court is Defendant Paris Young's Motion to Suppress Evidence1 (Doc. 44), the Government's Response in Opposition (Doc. 46), and United States Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Count's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 77). The Court has also reviewed the transcript from the hearing held on January 16, 2020 (Doc. 72).

After carefully reviewing Judge Count's report and conducting an independent review of the record and applicable law, see L.R. 74.1(a), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 77) and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 44).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. While Defendant labels his motion as one to suppress evidence, the relief sought in the motion is to dismiss under Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(a)(1)(A) and 48(b).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer