KETTLE v. KENNY, 8:13CV171. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140505c62
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 02, 2014
Latest Update: May 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 43 ). Petitioner seeks reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order and Judgment dated April 18, 2014, in which the Court dismissed petitioner's habeas corpus petition because it is a second or successive petition that has not been authorized by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Filing No. 40 ). Upon careful consid
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 43 ). Petitioner seeks reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order and Judgment dated April 18, 2014, in which the Court dismissed petitioner's habeas corpus petition because it is a second or successive petition that has not been authorized by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Filing No. 40 ). Upon careful conside..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 43). Petitioner seeks reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order and Judgment dated April 18, 2014, in which the Court dismissed petitioner's habeas corpus petition because it is a second or successive petition that has not been authorized by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Filing No. 40).
Upon careful consideration, the Court finds no good cause to reconsider any portion of its previous order. As set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated April 18, 2014, if petitioner wishes to pursue this matter, he should file a motion with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals fully addressing the legal requirements for successive habeas corpus petitions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 43) is denied.
Source: Leagle
