RAMOS v. FISHER, 13-cv-1059 (ADM/HB). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20141015h75
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner Mar
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner Mark..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner Mark Ramos's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and
3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
